[GEM-dev] pf/pdp/3dp in Gem

[Tom Schouten]

> >since it's really only 'get' and 'set' (just about exchainging data
> >with a gem render chain) i think this should be clear in the name.
> >
> >the object qualify as 'gem chain objects' not pdp objects. so [pdp_xxx]
> >seems confusing.
> 
> true.
> still i think that "pdp" should be in the name too, as [gem_set] 
> wouldn't necessarily have something to do with pdp packages.
> so probably [gem_pdpout} and [gem_pdpin] would be more apropriate ?
> (or [gem_pdp.out] and [gem_pdp.in])
> 
> 
...
> 
> 
> so the templates are almost done; just want to settle the name before i 
> check them in
>


[gem_pdp.out] and [gem_pdp.in] seem ok to me

or even

[out_pdp] and [in_pdp] to keep them shorter, since most gem
objects don't have a gem_ prefix.

yeah, politics!