[GEM-dev] Gem build error on Mac OS X 10.4

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> i think we disagree here.
>> ./configure --with-pd=/path/to/pd should be able to build a running
>> version of Gem (here we agree (and this did not work!)), but there is no
>> need to ignore available libraries on the building machine for the sake
>> of packaging (for machines that lack this dylibs).
>> this is what we have the configure-flags for...
> 
> I don't think it should ignore anything, instead it should prioritize. 
> If it finds both libquicktime and the Quicktime Framework on Mac OS X,
> it should choose the QuickTime framework over libquicktime.  Right now,
> it does the opposite.

not quite.
imo, it should use everything available.
if (and only if) things conflict, then it should prioritize,
right now, QuickTime framework _is_ prioritized over libquicktime (this
was the fix for the buildfarm osx10.4 machine; one (1) week ago this
prioritisation (or however this is called) was not done).

my proposal to use the series of --without flags was rather to use the
dependencies on dylibs (like libdv, libquicktime (regardless of the
conflict) and so on)

so now i think, we do agree here (though we probably misunderstand each
other)

mfg.adr.
IOhannes