[GEM-dev] shall we release?

[cyrille henry]

hello,

"Release early, release often”

0.90 was release many years ago, so yes, i think release is a good idea.

Cyrille


IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> even though i have already mentioned it in my emails regarding the w32, 
> i would like to ask you what you all think of doing a 0.91 release of 
> Gem within the next weeks.
> 
> for me, the main reason to not release was, that there were no recent 
> binaries for w32, and i have been unable to produce them for a while (i 
> just gave up after 3 fruitless days several times). for whatever reasons 
> i have been able to produce binaries, so we should use the opportunity:-)
> 
> 
> so far, nobody has yet complained about the w32 binaries i posted, so 
> they seem to run stable.
> 
> remaining issues are:
> - OSX: marius' reports of flickering (could you be a bit more specific 
> as to what "flickering" means exactly?)
> - linux: crashes on window-close with intel-based gfxcards
> - linux: lqt backend of [pix_record] still crashes sometimes (i really 
> suspect that it is lqt not fullfilling what it promises in the 
> API-documentation)
> 
> we probably could just release now (with these issues), and put out 
> bugfix-releases once these issues are solved.
> 
> 
> mgfa.sdr
> IOhannes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
> 
>