[GEM-dev] [ pd-gem-Bugs-3484469 ] some suggestions for using error(), verbose(), etc.

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Fri Feb 10 19:22:03 CET 2012


Bugs item #3484469, was opened at 2012-02-04 16:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507079&aid=3484469&group_id=64325

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: some suggestions for using error(), verbose(), etc.

Initial Comment:
Since Pd now has the nice log level handling, here is a commit from Pd-extended 0.43.1 that can be taken as suggestions for how to use error() and verbose() to make the Gem debug messages more useful.  Right now they are very verbose and in the '2 - normal' level, and can be confusing especially to newbies.

Here's the commit in question, you can get the diff file from it too:
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data?view=revision&revision=15947

(and sorry I mistakenly committed to the old pd-gem svn, ignore that)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Date: 2012-02-10 10:22

Message:
and a related fix:
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data?view=revision&revision=15957

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507079&aid=3484469&group_id=64325



More information about the GEM-dev mailing list