[GEM-dev] USB 3.0 camera and Gem
Jack
jack at rybn.org
Tue Apr 3 11:34:49 CEST 2012
Le 02/04/2012 09:48, Antoine Villeret a écrit :
> hi,
>
> i got 60 fps in 640x480 / grayscale which is the default image
> configuration and the more bandwith expensive for this camera
>
>
> ++
> a
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> do it yourself
> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr
> http://drii.ensad.fr
> --
> Google lit ce mail...
> si vous refusez cela, utilisez l'adresse antoine.villeret [at] free.fr
> <http://free.fr> pour me contacter
>
>
>
> Le 1 avril 2012 15:42, Jack <jack at rybn.org <mailto:jack at rybn.org>> a
> écrit :
>
> Le 01/04/2012 14:18, Antoine Villeret a écrit :
>> hi jack,
>>
>> i'm using a firewire 400 over RJ45 extender (from AVT) on a tour
>> with an AVT Guppy
>> it's work fine with 50m cable, it should work at least until 100m
>> but i never tried
>> it's not possible to use switch to increase the distance with
>> this kind of extender
>>
>> you can use certain switches with GigE but it increases latency
>> i think
>>
>> another solution for very long distance (more than 100m) is the
>> optical fiber
>> you can find some firewire over optical fiber extender
>>
>> Basler made a technical report on industrial cameras interface here :
>> http://www.i2s-vision.fr/upload/BAS1108_Interfaces.pdf
>>
>> hope this helps
>>
>> ++
>> a.
>> --
>> do it yourself
>> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr
>> http://drii.ensad.fr
>> --
>> Google lit ce mail...
>> si vous refusez cela, utilisez l'adresse antoine.villeret [at]
>> free.fr <http://free.fr> pour me contacter
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 1 avril 2012 13:56, Jack <jack at rybn.org
>> <mailto:jack at rybn.org>> a écrit :
>>
>> Le 01/04/2012 02:22, Max a écrit :
>>
>> Am 01.04.2012 um 01:53 schrieb Jack:
>>
>> PS : does anybody tried an other solution (like GigE
>> or USB<->Ethernet<->USB) with Gem when you need long
>> distance between camera and computer ? Is it very
>> stable ?
>>
>> I could offer vnc access to a os x or ubuntu machine
>> hooked up to either a Allied Vision Tech GigE or Firewire
>> 800 camera.
>>
>> m.
>>
>>
>> Hello Max,
>>
>> Did you ever tried that solution ?
>> Is it appropriate to detect very small movement and is it
>> enough fast to be used in real time (not to much latency ?) ?
>> ++
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at iem.at <mailto:GEM-dev at iem.at>
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>
>>
>
> Hello Antoine,
>
> Thanx to share your configuration and the Basler technical report,
> it is a useful document.
> What is the resolution the framerate you get on your computer from
> your camera with that configuration ?
> ++
>
> Jack
>
>
>
OK. I would prefer a camera with 640x480 pixels at 120 fps minimum to be
more precise in the detection of very small movements.
++
Jack
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20120403/f3d3f6af/attachment.htm>
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list