[GEM-dev] Gem Build Errors

[j-p k]

and by "no errors" i mean it loaded

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:35 PM, j-p k <jptrkz at gmail.com> wrote:

> continuing the architecture of ftgl question:
> i found the 1.5+ year old git-gem compiled against 0.45-4 and after
> running with this new computer received:
> (something-like) "libftgl.2.dylib mach-o but wrong architecture"
> then, in terminal:
> file libftgl.2.1.3.dylib:
> *"libftgl.2.1.3.dylib: Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library
> x86_64"*
>
> ..so i don't think it's enough (or even works at all) to use --32-bit or
> --universal for installing ftgl
>
> after replacing libftgl.2.1.3(64-bit) with a libftgl.2(32-bit) in the
> /usr/local/Cellar/etc, i get no errors with git-Gem and 32bit
> pd-vanilla(all versions tried).  what is the best way to obtain 32-bit ftgl?
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:04 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/06/2016 08:02 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> > since these are just ordinary abstractions like any other
>>
>> well, they are externals, rather than abstractions.
>> so do you have an idea why they cannot be loaded? (e.g. some unresolved
>> symbols thing? which one??)
>>
>> gfdmase
>> IOhannes
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at lists.iem.at
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20160506/1ed54932/attachment.html>