The Intel chips are awful at OpenGL. I tested an Intel MacMini and returned it.<br><br>Post the patch you are using and I can test it on some machines.<br><br>cgc<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/18/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Frank Barknecht</b> <<a href="mailto:fbar@footils.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">fbar@footils.org
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hallo,<br>chris clepper hat gesagt: // chris clepper wrote:<br><br>> pix_snap2tex should not impose much of a performance hit unless the window
<br>> resolution is really huge (2048x1536 or larger). If it does then it has<br>> probably fallen back to software to do a pixel format conversion or there is<br>> some other hardware incompatibility.<br><br>Is there some way to debug this a bit deeper if performance losses are
<br>happening? As I wrote I have two machines where performance of<br>pix_snap2tex is a problem on both. Maybe I just miss a bit of tuning<br>on my system. But at least the Intel chip is becoming more popular<br>with the new Intel-Macs, so maybe other people run into similar
<br>problems as well. (Though I'm running Linux, not OS-X ...)<br><br>Ciao<br>--<br> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>GEM-dev mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:GEM-dev@iem.at" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">GEM-dev@iem.at</a><br><a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br>