<div dir="ltr"><p class=""><span class="">compiled against version & running version = 0.47 (keeping everything 32 bit)</span></p><p class=""><span class="">output:</span></p><p class=""><span class="">/Applications/Pd-0.47-0test2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures</span></p>
<p class=""><span class="">/Applications/Pd-0.47-0test2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd (for architecture i386):<span class="">   </span>Mach-O executable i386</span></p>
<p class=""><span class="">/Applications/Pd-0.47-0test2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd (for architecture ppc7400):<span class="">        </span>Mach-O executable ppc</span></p><p class="">pretty sure i got the same results with 0.45-4 but i'll try again tomorrow.  0.45-4 was working with git-Gem on another computer running osx10.6 at the point gemvertexbuffer hit the wall</p></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zmoelnig@iem.at" target="_blank">zmoelnig@iem.at</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 2016-05-03 09:40, j-p k wrote:<br>
> Gem.pd_darwin: Mach-O bundle i386<br>
<br>
thanks.<br>
<br>
"one" more question: i just noticed that you are compiling against<br>
Pd-0.47-0test2.<br>
<br>
- do you use the same version to load Gem?<br>
- whats the output of<br>
  $ file /Applications/Pd-0.47-0test2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd<br>
- can you try to load Gem with another version of Pd?<br>
- can you try compiling Gem against another version of Pd?<br>
<br>
<br>
fmgsd<br>
IO(asking dumb questions and hoping to get a hint)hannes<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
GEM-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:GEM-dev@lists.iem.at">GEM-dev@lists.iem.at</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>