SF or IEM CVS? (WAS: Re: [PD-dev] cvs-commit list)

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 06:20 America/New_York, Luke Yelavich 
wrote:

> At 07:37 PM 2/10/2003, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> probably we could migrate the CVS from sourceforge to iem 
>> (medium-term or long-term), which might be faster on the long run 
>> (but of course we cannot offer a compile farm)
>
> I see this as a good thing, as IIRC, SourceForge's CVS for anonymous 
> access is 24 hours behind what it should be.
>

They are in the middle of a big upgrade, so I think that their CVS 
service will get much better.  They are adding 6 new servers, starting 
from the original 2.  They already have two new ones in place and I 
think that the CVS service has gotten noticably better.  So I think we 
stick it out with SF for a bit longer.

But there is something nice about having everything in one place.

.hc


                                     http://at.or.at/hans/