[PD-dev] OSCx License is not free?

[Andrew (Andy) W. Schmeder]

On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 07:27, guenter geiger wrote:
> Really bad situation. I think the CNMAT should rethink its license,
> especially if they want OSC to become a standard. Its strange that the
> topic didn't show up before.

Only the 'OSC-Kit' code is covered by that license (i.e. the OSC
specification is still free).

One could easily use another implementation, e.g. Steve Harris's new
liblo. (and it might be better code anyways - osckit did not strike me
as being particularly robust, its more like an example than a
production-ready library)

-- 
Andrew (Andy) W. Schmeder
<andy \at a2hd \dot com>
http://www.a2hd.com/