[PD-dev] fixed pdtcl prob on 10.4/gcc4.0!
tigital at mac.com
Wed May 11 20:46:59 CEST 2005
On May 11, 2005, at 2:34 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On May 11, 2005, at 12:25 AM, james tittle wrote:
>> ...so I just changed references to "pdtcl" in the makefile & pd.tk
>> to "pdtcl.dylib", and then changed the following in the makefile:
>> #this is for Max OSX only...
>> $(BIN_DIR)/pdtcl.dylib: $(GOBJ) $(GSRC)
>> cd ../obj; gcc -dynamiclib -o $(BIN_DIR)/pdtcl.dylib $(GOBJ) \
>> /Library/Frameworks/Tk.framework/Versions/Current/Tk \
>> /Library/Frameworks/Tcl.framework/Versions/Current/Tcl \
>> ...also note that it's much better to refer things like above than
>> "../../whatever", because that is dependent on whatever dev setup
>> order you have (and doesn't work for me and many others)...also,
>> we had a laugh about the "Max OSX" typo: just can't shake yr
>> teacher, eh? ;-)
> The "../../Frameworks" path is necessary for building Pd using the
> TclTkStandalone Wish.app, unless you have found another way to
> build the Pd.app. If so, that would be awesome. Please enlighten us.
> If not, its easy enough to have autoconf choose between "/Library/
> Frameworks" and "../../Frameworks".
...please enlighten me, then, as to how autoconf would choose
this...perhaps we need a flag for choosing to build the app or the
cli? In any event, the frameworks are now there in 10.4, tho I like
relative frameworks because that means we can upgrade tcl/tk more
...also note that I've now been contacted by an apple engineer who
says that the "-read_only_relocs suppress" should probably be "-
read_only_relocs warning", because this is still something to
fix...it may be that it's linking with non-PIC objects, but that'd
only take a performance hit on each launch of whatever uses the
More information about the Pd-dev