TimBlechmann at gmx.net
Wed May 11 23:11:25 CEST 2005
> Renaming to community sounds good. But if you are going to fork (i.e.
> make structural changes, IMPd, etc.) then it seems that we should have
> a distinct fork branch, and a devel branch. devel would be for adding
> changes to miller's version and the community/fork branch would be
well, i disagree with you ... the changes that have been made to devel
reached a point, where they can't easily be merged with miller's version
any more ...
of course, someone could branch of a devel2_0_39 that's based on
stable_0_39 ... but i think this is not worth the effort.
having more than one major branches _is_ a bad idea (but it's the
current situation) ... having more two is insane.
so the one branching from stable_ should consider discussing with the
PD community / Pure Devil developers about the changes he proposes...
> Or it'd probably make the most sense to keep devel as a branch, then
> make the "community" fork its own directory. If the idea is to make
> major, incompatible changes then keeping it a branch doesn't seem to
> make a lot of sense to me.
well a few changes will have to be made. some may even break the binary
compatibility with miller's branch ...
still, i think it would be a very bad approach to get a too big distance
between miller's pd and what's now devel ...
cheers ... tim
mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de ICQ: 96771783
latest mp3: kMW.mp3
latest cd: Goh Lee Kwang & Tim Blechmann: Drone
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space
would say "I want to see the manager."
William S. Burroughs
More information about the Pd-dev