[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1405137 ] multiple $arg-expansion
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Sat Jan 14 20:09:06 CET 2006
Thomas Grill wrote:
>
> Am 13.01.2006 um 20:40 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
>
>> now that is most likely even cooler than the
>> abstraction-classname-binding...
>>
>> please do some testing...
>
>
> Today, when doing a workshop with some pd newcomers i was once more
> embarassed about the tricks i needed to use $0 inside a message. Since
> $0 is special anyway, is there a real reason for it?
>
do you mean, is there a reason for my patch, a reason for $0 or a reason
for $0 being "different" in messages?
mfg.ad.r
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list