[PD-dev] loader: 0.40 or devel_0_39 ?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Sat Dec 9 18:26:52 CET 2006
The loader in 0.40 takes advantage of the canvas-local paths that
were introduced in 0.40. Were any changes made to the loader in
devel_0_39 after Thomas' code was included by Miller?
.hc
On Dec 9, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> I see that the loader code in Miller's 0.40, Miller's 0.39 and
> devel_0_39 are completely different. This means that the diff
> between the first two and the diff between the latter two, have a
> lot of conflicts that can't be fixed without sitting down and
> figuring out what should be done.
>
> So, my question is, is everybody satisfied by Miller's 0.40's
> s_loader.c ? If yes, then I can just use that. Else, how should
> some devel_0_39 features be added to it? I'm thinking specifically
> of the altname parameter, which doesn't appear at all in Miller's.
> What is it useful for?
>
> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
> | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC
> Canada_______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list