[PD-dev] loader: 0.40 or devel_0_39 ?

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Sat Dec 9 18:26:52 CET 2006


The loader in 0.40 takes advantage of the canvas-local paths that  
were introduced in 0.40.  Were any changes made to the loader in  
devel_0_39 after Thomas' code was included by Miller?

.hc

On Dec 9, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

> I see that the loader code in Miller's 0.40, Miller's 0.39 and  
> devel_0_39 are completely different. This means that the diff  
> between the first two and the diff between the latter two, have a  
> lot of conflicts that can't be fixed without sitting down and  
> figuring out what should be done.
>
> So, my question is, is everybody satisfied by Miller's 0.40's  
> s_loader.c ? If yes, then I can just use that. Else, how should  
> some devel_0_39 features be added to it? I'm thinking specifically  
> of the altname parameter, which doesn't appear at all in Miller's.  
> What is it useful for?
>
>  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
> | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC  
> Canada_______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


------------------------------------------------------------------------

As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be  
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and  
this we should do freely and generously.         - Benjamin Franklin






More information about the Pd-dev mailing list