[PD-dev] strings
padawan12
padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Sat Dec 16 13:16:22 CET 2006
Thanks Hans and IOhan, I think Bryans offering covers most
of what is needed, adequate to muddle by until such time when we
have real strings.
Andy
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:41:03 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at eds.org> wrote:
>
> You can do a fair amount of string handling with [list2symbol] and
> things like that. But yes, it leaves a lot to be desired. Bryan
> Jurish has taken a different approach, which is to use lists of bytes
> to represent strings. Might be worth checking out.
>
> .hc
>
> On Dec 15, 2006, at 2:06 AM, padawan12 wrote:
>
> > A new and keen developer on the forums has asked - "What about text
> > processing
> > in Pd?" to which I replied "Pd doesn't do strings".
> > I tie myself in knots trying string-like operations sometimes :),
> > so I know
> > its a can of worms, but what are the fundamental limitations
> > surrounding symbol.
> > How do we deal with EOL or NULL and so on, and what about encoding?
> > Did I hear
> > a rumour that better string handling is chalked in for Pd soon? An
> > alphanumeric
> > sort, maybe even a [grep] or [sed]? What would be the best way to
> > introduce the
> > concept of strings to Pd in a consistent and robust way. I see them
> > as lists of
> > symbols without any need for a new type but right now there are
> > pieces of the
> > jigsaw missing. Sorry so many questions, but it's bugging me today.
> > a.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-dev mailing list
> > PD-dev at iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> All information should be free. - the hacker ethic
>
>
>
>
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list