[PD-dev] Reliable MIDI library for Windows?
PSPunch
shima at pspunch.com
Tue Jul 1 14:21:05 CEST 2008
Hi, Thomas.
Did not quite catch up on weather you meant that the PortMidi libraries
should work as is, or needs a simple patch applied.
In any case, yes, I do have the interest.. and time, perhaps I can manage.
Is this literally a patch to be applied to the source?
I do mainly work on pd-extended, and building either distros, I have not
been very successful under windows.
I am certainly sure I will learn something from it.
--
David Shimamoto
> Hi David,
> the devel_0_39 branch of pure data completely relies on PortMidi for all
> platforms.
> We (the vibrez team) found that to work perfectly also for sysex,
> realtime etc. messages under Windows.
> It's fairly easy to provide a patch for vanilla PD, provided one has got
> time and interest.
>
> gr~~~
>
> Am 26.06.2008 um 08:35 schrieb PSPunch:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I understand that MIDI objects under Windows is said to be less stable
>> than Linux, due to the MIDI functions under Windows API that Pd relies
>> on.
>>
>> If I were to write my own MIDI I/O external for Windows, are there such
>> things as alternative MIDI libraries or APIs available, or does Windows
>> not allow you to access MIDI devices it recognizes without running data
>> through its interface?
>>
>> Like some posts I made about a month back, my initial goal is to get raw
>> MIDI in&out working, this time on Windows.
>>
>> Any hints appreciated.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> David Shimamoto
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing list
>> Pd-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>>
>
>
>
> Thomas Grill
> http://grrrr.org
>
>
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list