[PD-dev] enabling Gem's explicit help-patches (was: Re: Pd-cvs Digest, Vol 41, Issue 12)
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Tue Jul 15 04:55:29 CEST 2008
On Jul 14, 2008, at 6:06 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> pd-cvs-request at iem.at wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:05:58 -0700
>> From: eighthave at users.sourceforge.net
>>
>> added back the help symbol prefix and set it as 'Gem/', since it
>> is needed to make the helpfiles work in the current setup
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>> branches/pd-extended/v0-40/packages/Makefile
>>
>> Modified: branches/pd-extended/v0-40/packages/Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- branches/pd-extended/v0-40/packages/Makefile 2008-07-11
>> 14:45:51 UTC (rev 10162)
>> +++ branches/pd-extended/v0-40/packages/Makefile 2008-07-12
>> 01:05:57 UTC (rev 10163)
>> @@ -479,15 +479,18 @@
>> # always run aclocal/autoconf until "configure" is deleted from CVS
>> cd $(gem_src)/src && aclocal
>> cd $(gem_src)/src && autoconf
>> - cd $(gem_src)/src && ./configure --without-ffmpeg --with-pd=$
>> (pd_src) \
>> - --disable-NV
>> + cd $(gem_src)/src && ./configure \
>> + DEFINES='-DHELPSYMBOL -DHELPSYMBOL_BASE="Gem/"' \
>> + --without-ffmpeg --with-pd=$(pd_src) --disable-NV
>> $(MAKE) -C $(gem_src)/src
>>
>
> good try, but unfortunately it doesn't work like this.
> the "HELPSYMBOL" define is not a boolean, but really the actual
> help-symbol you request.
> so even if quoting worked in the attempt (which it does not), what you
> would get is that all Gem-objects would have the same help-patch
> "Gem/1"
> (which would eventually expand to "Gem/1-help"...)
>
>
> i suggest to not mess around with the HELPSYMBOL defines, but
> rather put
> the the binary and the reference-files into extra/Gem/.
>
> if you want to keep the reference-patches in doc/5.reference/Gem, why
> not duplicate them for now?
I guess I'll do the help file duplicates in extra/Gem. I was trying
to avoid making things even more messy.
.hc
> fmgasfd.r
> IOhannes
>
>
>
> PS: probably trying it locally once before submitting it would have
> been
> a good idea :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list