[PD-dev] Requesting SVN commit access

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2014-02-26 04:57, Martin Peach wrote:
> I think that sending and receiving on the same port is not an 
> intended use of the UDP protocol, which was designed for throw and 
> forget messaging.

how come? how does DNS (after all, a central service in the internet)
work with this assumption?

UDP works fine with as a challenge/response system (less so as
client/server, given that there is no notion of a "connection"), and
for responses you need o be able to send messages somewhere.

for whatever reasons, many hardware manufacturers have the idea that
sending/receiving on the *same* port is a good idea.

fgmasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=of+H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----