[PD-dev] atoms not same height as objects?

Dan Wilcox danomatika at gmail.com
Wed Sep 20 15:23:49 CEST 2017


It's on the list. I have the sizing from extended mostly working which fixes the object & atom sizing issues we're seeing with 0.48.

> On Sep 18, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Kevin Haywood <khaywood at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> 
> If you’re considering cleaning up things of this nature, then I’d add that outlets currently only extend two pixels into objects, messages, etc., whereas inlets extend 3 (and are therefore much easier to see).  This is the case on macOS, at least.
> 
> If this was by design, then please ignore : )
> 
> Cheers,
> Kevin
> 
> 
>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 2:35 AM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika at gmail.com <mailto:danomatika at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> So it would be fine to use the same vert sizing as object boxes? I have that now in some testing and it looks good, especially for symbols. Maybe I'm too picky with the details :)
>> 
>>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 12:12 AM, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu <mailto:msp at ucsd.edu>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think there's only a very stupid, short-sighted reason: since numbers
>>> never have descenders, it wasn't necessary to add a pixel of whitespace
>>> underneath the rendered string.  I was intent on reducing the size of
>>> everything to its absolute minimum.
>>> 
>>> I was forgetting about (or maybe not anticipating) "symbol" boxes - it's
>>> easy to make symbol box text collide with the box's outlet.  And "|"
>>> characters can hit the bottom edge of the box even away from the outlet.
>>> 
>>> cheers
>>> Miller
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:10:50PM +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:
>>>> Is there a reason why atoms and slightly shorter in height than object boxes, at least on macOS?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not asking for the technical reason, as I know in the code why this is, but more the conceptual reason, or is it a bug?
>>>> 
>>>> --------
>>>> Dan Wilcox
>>>> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>>
>>>> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> <http://danomatika.com/ <http://danomatika.com/>>
>>>> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> <http://robotcowboy.com/ <http://robotcowboy.com/>>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pd-dev mailing list
>>>> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-dev at lists.iem.at>
>>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev>
>>> 
>> 
>> --------
>> Dan Wilcox
>> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
>> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
>> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing list
>> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-dev at lists.iem.at>
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev>

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20170920/1270c05f/attachment.html>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list