[PD-dev] double precision pd?

[Christof Ressi]

> PS: there's also some more of my PRs which i would like to draw 
> special attention to (for inclusion with Pd-0.54) 
To follow up, it would be great if Pd 0.54 could include my scheduler 
fixes/improvements:

https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1756

It has been tested by several people on all major operating systems and 
I have been using it myself in production since autumn 2022.

---

Two trivial PRs:

Improve [pack] reentrancy handling:
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1762/files

Make openpanel/savepanel dialogs window modal
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/764

---

The following PRs have been lingering for 3-4 years (!) now, although 
they seem rather uncontroversial and pretty useful to me.

"-open-with-args" command line option
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1064

Clone improvements
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1069

"goprect" message
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/627


Christof

On 03.06.2023 23:37, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> On 6/3/23 20:02, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>> Hi, with pd 0.54-0 round the corner, what is still preventing us from
>> shipping double precision pd downloads?
>
> from my side: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1605
>
> it would be nice if this could be merged for the 0.54 release¹
>
> in the meantime, i've instructed our CI to also produce a (signed) DMG 
> for double-precision Pds.
> i'll try to also generate Windows installers for sinlge/double 
> precision (and 32bit/64bit pointers).
>
> so it should be straightforward for miller to publish useable files 
> fordouble precision.
>
> but i really think that #1605 should be applied first.
>
> fmdsa
> IOhannes
>
> PS: there's also some more of my PRs which i would like to draw 
> special attention to (for inclusion with Pd-0.54)
> - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1397
> - https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1590
> others like #1929 or #1766 would of course be nice to have as well (as 
> are most of my PRs ;-))
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev