<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
Marc Lavallée wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:200309160927.28057.odradek@videotron.ca">
<pre wrap="">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<br><br>Le 16 Septembre 2003 05:02, Frank Barknecht a écrit :<br></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hallo,<br><br>Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:<br></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I tried to remove the "help-" prefix and got into severe (but stupid)<br>problems... The reason they're there is so that abstractions won't<br>try to load themselves when you ask for help on them. But I should<br>have designed the "sethelp" feature not to prepend the name. Now<br>it's too complicated to back out of that (100s of names I would break<br>again by taking it out!)<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">I could try to come up with a clever regular expression (from my web<br>devel. days) for replacing all in one go. Is it just about adding<br>"help-" back into the object sources?<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!----><br>I use a perl script to remove all "help-" prefix before compiling PD, <br>because it's easier to browse the documentation without the "help-" <br>prefix. About the abstraction problem, why do abstractions needs separate <br>help patches?<br></pre>
</blockquote>
i don't really see the point here, <br>
i've never seen any help patch for an abstraction,<br>
still it's boring not to be able to set up your own help<br>
patches in a separate directory <br>
( i thought gem's people would complain ).<br>
<br>
anyway, why changing rules ??<br>
( well no rules, no rules is better )<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
sevy<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:200309160927.28057.odradek@videotron.ca">
<pre wrap=""><br></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>