What's the point of keeping this "running two instances" feature and make the check as default ?<br>Why not take the opportunity to rework the scheduler (with threads) so we don't have to launch two instances ?<br>
Sorry if I'm missing smth ... and please explain :)<br><br>++<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/13/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mathieu Bouchard</b> <<a href="mailto:matju@artengine.ca">matju@artengine.ca</a>
> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, padawan12 wrote:<br>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:39:16 -0400 (EDT)
<br>> Mathieu Bouchard <<a href="mailto:matju@artengine.ca">matju@artengine.ca</a>> wrote:<br>> Agreed, but actually it would be good to have the choice as a comandline<br>> arg of the first one launched with a way to accept patches to open in
<br>> the same instance from, say a web browser. Like also when you are in a file<br>> manager and browsing some .pd files you really want them to open in the same<br>> running instance.<br><br>oh ok, if it's an option... i put it in my TODO.
<br><br> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...<br>| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - <a href="http://artengine.ca/matju">http://artengine.ca/matju</a><br>| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>PD-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:PD-dev@iem.at">PD-dev@iem.at</a><br><a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>