<div>Of course, I'm not a developer, but I think that this is a smart way to go. Especially interchangeability of GUI components. Who knows when a nice, new version of a given object may be forged by a rogue programmer to be easily dropped into place...
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>~Kyle<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/14/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Thomas Grill</b> <<a href="mailto:gr@grrrr.org">gr@grrrr.org</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">>><br>>><br>>> In a first step towards making Pd a micro-language, I propose moving<br>>> the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into the "extra" folder,
<br>>> compiled as individual files. The only changes needed to make this<br>>> happen is to rename and move the relevant g_*.c files to extra,<br>>> renaming the setup() functions accordingly, and changing the
<br>>> makefile. All of these are pretty trivial.<br>>><br>>> Thoughts, comments, objections, improvements?<br>>><br><br>I'm all for it, in my opinion all gui elements should be optional and/<br>or exchangeable.
<br><br>greetings,<br>Thomas<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>PD-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:PD-dev@iem.at">PD-dev@iem.at</a><br><a href="http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev">http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br><a href="http://theradioproject.com">http://theradioproject.com</a><br><a href="http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com">http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com</a><br><br>(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
<br>(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))<br>))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________<br>_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______<br>((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO