[PD] [gogins at pipeline.com: Re: [Csnd] Csound vs PD]
Frank Barknecht
barknech at ph-cip.uni-koeln.de
Wed Aug 15 09:54:35 CEST 2001
Hi,
here's a good question from the Csound list. CC'ing to csound at lists.bath.ac.uk
would be nice.
----- Forwarded message from gogins at pipeline.com -----
From: gogins at pipeline.com
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:16:45 -0400
To: csound at lists.bath.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [Csnd] Csound vs PD
What I meant is "out of real time." In other words, if there are too many instruments running to work in real time, so that a performance would experience dropouts, the performance can still be saved as a soundfile without dropouts, even if it takes, for exmaple, ten minutes to render a 2 minute piece.
csound at lists.bath.ac.uk wrote:
>
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Csnd] Csound vs PD
> Thanks for your very informative reply. What you are saying is what I
thought would be the case based on just looking at PD after heavy use of
Csound.
>
> Is there ANY way PD can render to a soundfile out of real time?
>
YES. There are several objects which allow you to save the output to HD.
----- End forwarded message -----
--
__ __
Frank Barknecht ____ ______ ____ __ trip\ \ / /wire ______
/ __// __ /__/ __// // __ \ \/ / __ \\ ___\
/ / / ____/ / / / // ____// /\ \\ ___\\____ \
/_/ /_____/ /_/ /_//_____// / \ \\_____\\_____\
/_/ \_\
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list