[PD] [gogins at pipeline.com: Re: [Csnd] Csound vs PD]

Frank Barknecht barknech at ph-cip.uni-koeln.de
Wed Aug 15 09:54:35 CEST 2001


Hi,

here's a good question from the Csound list. CC'ing to csound at lists.bath.ac.uk 
would be nice.


----- Forwarded message from gogins at pipeline.com -----

From: gogins at pipeline.com
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:16:45 -0400
To: csound at lists.bath.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [Csnd] Csound vs PD

What I meant is "out of real time." In other words, if there are too many instruments running to work in real time, so that a performance would experience dropouts, the performance can still be saved as a soundfile without dropouts, even if it takes, for exmaple, ten minutes to render a 2 minute piece.

csound at lists.bath.ac.uk wrote:
> 
----- Original Message -----
From: 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Csnd] Csound vs PD


> Thanks for your very informative reply. What you are saying is what I
thought would be the case based on just looking at PD after heavy use of
Csound.
>
> Is there ANY way PD can render to a soundfile out of real time?
>
YES. There are several objects which allow you to save the output to HD.


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
                                                 __    __
 Frank Barknecht       ____ ______   ____ __ trip\ \  / /wire ______
                      / __// __  /__/ __// // __  \ \/ /  __ \\  ___\	
                     / /  / ____/  / /  / // ____// /\ \\  ___\\____ \	
                    /_/  /_____/  /_/  /_//_____// /  \ \\_____\\_____\
                                                /_/    \_\ 



More information about the Pd-list mailing list