[PD] local arrays

[pix]

hi, this is _the_ FAQ.

[table $0-bla]

the $0 is unique for every instance of every abstraction.

pix.

On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:39:17 +0100
"leo {depart}" <oel at depart.at> wrote:

> hi everyone!
> 
> i have a question concerning local variables in pd:
> 
> i wrote an abstraction which contains a data array. this array is only
> relevant inside
> the abstraction, but i need flexible amount of instances (of the
> abstraction)...
> therefore i can't give the array a fixed name (-->warning: arr: multiply
> defined)
> neither can i use the usual way of using a $1 placeholder and which gets
> replaced on
> initialisation (because in that case i'd need to get track of the number
> of instances already used, etc)
> 
> so, is there either a way of using an auto-generic variable-name or a
> way to keep an array local, so that
> the multiples won't interfere.
> 
> thanks a lot
> 
> leo
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list