[PD] PD 4 EM

[Jeffrey Hildebrand]

       i agree with you to an extent. pd has seen a lot of success and has
grown much from the time and effort of its users, but it's typically only
used by a certain kind of techie person. i really think that pd could
become more of a mainstream type of software in teaching, music production,
and in art. this would only happen with a huge pouring-in of new users. 
 
                                                  scott

                          

> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:04:41 -0800 (PST)
> "J. Scott Hildebrand" <jshildebrand at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> 
> > if they don't make it, then it's likely you'll never hear
> > another record from then again... and if pd doesn't "make it," it'll never
> > improve and it'll become old dusty software that very few people use.
> 
> Sorry Scott, but this statement is completely ridiculous. Pd itself is a
direct contradictory example to what you're saying.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Chris.
> _________________________________
> chris at mccormick.cx
> http://www.mccormick.cx
> http://www.sciencegirlrecords.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>