[PD] PiDiP 0.8.5 - mp3lame problem

Yves Degoyon ydegoyon at free.fr
Wed Feb 26 16:45:36 CET 2003


is the location where it is installed is included
in /etc/ld.so.conf ??

does a 'ldconfig -v' includes the lame libraries ??

220hex wrote:

>I reinstalled lame and libmp3lame from the source package, so here's what I've 
>got:
>
>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       376246 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.a
>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          668 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.la
>lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           19 2003-02-26 01:11 libmp3lame.so -> 
>libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
>lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           19 2003-02-25 23:47 libmp3lame.so.0 -> 
>libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
>-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       347012 2003-02-25 23:47 
>libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
>
>still not recognised from .configure...
>
>.gif
>
>Wednesday February 26 2003 15:36, skrev Yves Degoyon:
>
>>surely true !! tom !!
>>
>>but that's really silly from debian.
>>
>>cheers,
>>
>>sevy/yves
>>
>>Tom Schouten wrote:
>>
>>>>for the lame issue, i think it doesn't find
>>>>libmp3lame which must be in a weird location
>>>>on debian ((
>>>>
>>>>can't help you more from that distance )
>>>>
>>>maybe it has something to do with the fact that on debian, the libmp3lame
>>>package has only static libararies?
>>>
>>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       352520 Aug 16  2001 libmp3lame.a
>>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          668 Aug 16  2001 libmp3lame.la
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>maybe AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame) does not include statics?
>>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20030226/69b790b3/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list