[PD] pix_buf and separator

rainer . jepoxy at hotmail.com
Sun Mar 9 22:38:38 CET 2003


hi,
ok, here is a patch. it´s maybe not exactly what you want, for some reason 
you have a kind of hirarchical control. it works for me with gem 
0.87/win2000.

cheers
rainer




>From: "01ek" <01ek at sat.qc.ca>
>To: <pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at>
>Subject: [PD] pix_buf and separator
>Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:54:57 -0800
>
> >(this reminds me: i have fixed bugs in [pix_buf] and [separator]. going 
>to
> >check these in)
> >
>
>
>If I have a pix_video  that I want to texture map onto two seperate 
>objects,
>and be able to manipulate each object's parameters individually without 
>both
>objects being effected when I perform a rotate or translate, first I 
>thought
>that the separator object would work to do this. But the separtaor always
>crashes PD when I have an active pix_video in the chain. So Rainer told me
>to us the pix_buf instead, but that doesn't work either. I'm on Windows 
>2000
>with Gem 0.87; are the bugs you mention fixing responsible?
>
>I can't get a clear answer of whether the separator is supposed to work.
>Does it work with the pix_film, _movie, _video objects on other platforms?
>
>thanks for any clarification.
>alexander
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>PD-list mailing list
>PD-list at iem.kug.ac.at
>http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list


_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pix_buf.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6340 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20030309/f46080e0/attachment.obj>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list