Wiki glossary - was: [PD] programatically (dynamically) load abstractions?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Mon Nov 10 04:27:19 CET 2003
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
>
> > I visited this site
> > (http://pd.iem.at/pdwiki/index.php?PdInternalMessages , which is great)
> > and then, out of a misunderstanding (as i think), started to document
> > the WikiWords appearing there, like symbol, gimme, float etc. It seems
> > to be the case that pure text has been imported which contained some
> > [...] words, resulting in a WikiWord interpretation.
>
> No, I think this is a great idea in general. But of course, not every
> "gimme" should be interpreted as a Pd gimme, e.g. "gimme some time to fix
> that", but actually it is not. See for example:
> http://pd.iem.at/pdwiki/index.php?SandBox
>
> So the gimmes on the InternalMessage page are actually marked up as
> things that might need documentation by the farsighted original author.
>
> I only wonder, if the Pd-Wiki should not move over to pure-data.org
> somehow.
This should definitely be moved to pure-data.org. But instead of building
new wiki-based sites, I think new stuff should be done in the Plone-style
of making pages and publishing them. Its much more managable.
.hc
zen
\
\
\[D[D[D[D
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list