[PD] Re: [PD-announce] pool 0.2.0 - a hierarchical storage object

Thomas Grill gr at grrrr.org
Wed Aug 11 08:07:27 CEST 2004


Hi,

> Now seriously: I tested this with a slightly older pool from CVS (but
> tagged 0.2.0something) It saves in the directory of [fileio]. I don't
> see how an abstraction could know in which other patch it is used and
> what the directory of this patch is, but maybe there is a way.
> Generally I would recommend to stick to absolute paths where possible
> because of this. At least I expect this for Memento.

this behavior has not changed since 0.2.0something. I see from your example
that relative paths have their caveats.
I'm open for better solutions though - any suggestions?

best greetings,
Thomas





More information about the Pd-list mailing list