[PD] expr and expr(~) vs individual operators

Roman Haefeli reduzierer at yahoo.de
Sun Jan 16 04:26:57 CET 2005


ciao
i remember that someone from the list wrote that using [expr] or [expr~]
consumes more cpu than doing the equivalent with 'conventional' objs.
but i can't remember the reason and how much the difference is. maybe
you'll find it by searching the archive.

roman

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamie Bullock" <jamie at postlude.co.uk>
To: <pd-list at iem.at>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 11:48 PM
Subject: [PD] expr and expr(~) vs individual operators


> Dear all,
>
> Can anyone tell me what is more computationally efficient, the use of
> chains of individual mathematical operator objects or their equivalent
> in a single expr(~) object. For example, what would be quicker:
>
> |   |
> [+~ ]
> |
> [*~ 20]
>
> or
>
> [expr~ ($v1 + $v2) * 20]
>
>
> Jamie
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list





More information about the Pd-list mailing list