[PD] Re: [PD-dev] pdogg hacks

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Thomas Grill wrote:
>>
>> Ah, and you said you couldn't figure out how my oggamp~ was working so
>> you made your own one.... another fork? :-)
> 
> 
> Oh, true, i remember now - it's not a fork but a new implementation.
> That's because it was contract work and it was faster to write it from
> scratch than debug the existing code.
> I think, WInfried asked me if we should put it on SF - it seems that
> hasn't happened yet. Well - i had difficulties finding an unambiguous name.


it is already in the CVS under externals/iem/iemstream.

i think it still has the old (imo: bad) name "amp~" and i am not sure,
whether the build process works (this is: whether it really builds an
"amp~.pd_linux" or a "iemstream~.pd_linux"....)


mfg.asd.r
IOhannes