[PD] buffer 1 with Gem

[Erich Berger]

> btw, what do you people need the "buffer 1" feature for ?
> i thought of removing it a la long and "replace" it with some controllable 
> feedback in double-buffered mode.
> (this means: if single-buffered mode is used only to not make "traces" of 
> objects, this could be handled otherwise.)
> if someone needs full control over the render-chain, removing would probably 
> be a bad idea.

i would hardly wish not to remove it - if it does not break anything 
otherwise. its a feature and has possibilities - even if "we" do not know
at the moment what to do with it

cheers

erich