[PD] GEM pix_dv
Christian Veit
fanfare at gmx.at
Fri Sep 9 17:42:55 CEST 2005
Hallo,
> hm ... maybe you also need a /dev/ieee1394 - I don't really remember how
> I did it ...
So id tried to make device nodes for dv1394 and ieee1394 by
mknod -m 666 /dev/dv1394 c 171 34
mknod -m 666 /dev/ieee1394/dv/host0/PAL/in c 171 34
> > Or have i just forgotten some messages to [pix_video] i've only sent the
> > [driver 1( message to it.
> normally not - but just try ...
I've tried to send many different messages to [pix_video] but it doesn't
work.
So, i downloaded the source from gem 0.90 and tried to read it (I'm not
familiar with C/C++) and there is one thing which i have detected:
if gem is recognizing that there is dv it should write the message ieee1394
for linux, but it doesn't
The message only appears if HAVE_DV is defined, and HAVE_DV when HAVE_LIBDV
is defined but i couldn't find where HAVE_LIBDV is defined in the source,
and most interesting thing why HAVE_LIBDV or rather HAVE_DV is not
defined...
LG
Christian
> > following modules are loaded:
> > dv1394 19788 0
> > raw1394 28652 0
> > ohci1394 31876 1 dv1394
> > ieee1394 100408 4 dv1394,raw1394,ohci1394,sbp2
> looks good ...
>
> try to use [pix_video] and you must send a [driver 1( message, to tell
> the object to use dv ...
--
GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis!
2000 MB nur 2,99, Flatrate ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list