[PD] dealing with arguments and inlets

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> [list] is untested as compared to [route].  By untested, I don't mean
> bugs, but rather whether as a paradigm it makes sense in all possible
> ways.  There are already a lot of odd things with Pd's message handling,
> it'd would be bad to introduce more.

[route] hasn't been tested and it doesn't make sense as a paradigm. 
Neither does [trigger]. So what is it about all those double standards?

> what type of data does this output:
> [symbol arg!(
> |
> [list trim]

depends on how you (re)define the word data and the word type to suit your
fancy.

 _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada