[PD] Segmented Patch Chords? PVar / PV?
Roman Haefeli
reduzierer at yahoo.de
Mon Feb 13 13:57:07 CET 2006
hi
i never worked seriously with max/msp, so i cannot compare, but from my
experience with pd, i never had any problems with readability of my patches.
i think there are few alternative ways to keep a patch readable than
segmented patch chords, using subpatches or abstractions in order to create
sections with a special functionality. sometimes i even use a
[send]/[receive]-pair instead of a patch cord, just for readability
$0-send/receive: what would be the difference to a NOT-fake-mechanism? (i
don't know pvar nor pv)
roman
"Item State" <itemstatechanged at yahoo.de> wrote:
> hi,
>
> is there any means to get segmented patch chords in
> PD? as soon as i have a few feedback / recursive
> structures, the patch is terribly unreadable IMO.
>
> otherwise, are there some truly local send/receive
> objects, that is not those fake mechanism using a
> patcher instance number in the port name, something
> like PVar or PV in max?
>
> thanks, sciss
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list