[PD] PDDP meeting?
matju at artengine.ca
Mon May 1 16:36:51 CEST 2006
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:58:32PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > paint a complete picture, no matter which programming language it is being
> > asked about, even though I think that Pd has more holes than almost all
> > programming languages.
> So why are you still using it?
The trick is to use Pd for its advantages, not for its inconvenients.
> > Third is a rule for OOP in general, in any language: the final goal is
> > never to make a program "more OOP", it's to make a program better, by
> > any "paradigm" necessary.
> Fourth, watch out for communists, who are all out to get you.
I'd rather have you reply with interesting ideas, but I can deal with
flames too. It's sort of disappointing, though.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-list