Pd social aspects (Re: [PD] PDDP meeting?)

Arie van Schutterhoef arsche at xs4all.nl
Mon May 8 00:14:35 CEST 2006


>It would've been a worse decision to compete against C74-MAX directly,
-jMax actually had to because IRCAM used Max/MSP for most of their concerts,
 with the exceptions of some  Boulez and Manoury pieces. It was deemed too
 unreliable.

>harder to technically catch up with than Pd, and also is backed with a bigger
>company than a team of 2-4 people at IRCAM.
-I don't know whether jMax was technologically more or less advance. But it
 might have played a role. In the end not many people were using it and
combined
 with all kinds of transition problems from version 2 to 4, it was killed off.

AvS

  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................................................................

  `    |Schreck Ensemble    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +

    `  |# -laboratory for live electro-acoustic music- #            |
       |             http://www.schreck.nl/                         |
       |             http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/                 |
     ` *===========================================================++
     ` |Compositions http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/compo.html  |
     ` |Samples      http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/samp.html   |
     ` |Patches      http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/pat.html    |
     ` |Videos       http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/video.html  |

     ` |Scores       http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/scores.html |

       *===========================================================++
  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................................................................






More information about the Pd-list mailing list