Pd social aspects (Re: [PD] PDDP meeting?)
Arie van Schutterhoef
arsche at xs4all.nl
Mon May 8 00:14:35 CEST 2006
>It would've been a worse decision to compete against C74-MAX directly,
-jMax actually had to because IRCAM used Max/MSP for most of their concerts,
with the exceptions of some Boulez and Manoury pieces. It was deemed too
unreliable.
>harder to technically catch up with than Pd, and also is backed with a bigger
>company than a team of 2-4 people at IRCAM.
-I don't know whether jMax was technologically more or less advance. But it
might have played a role. In the end not many people were using it and
combined
with all kinds of transition problems from version 2 to 4, it was killed off.
AvS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................................................................
` |Schreck Ensemble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
` |# -laboratory for live electro-acoustic music- # |
| http://www.schreck.nl/ |
| http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/ |
` *===========================================================++
` |Compositions http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/compo.html |
` |Samples http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/samp.html |
` |Patches http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/pat.html |
` |Videos http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/video.html |
` |Scores http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/scores.html |
*===========================================================++
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................................................................
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list