[PD] amplitude of modal synthesis
frablanc at laposte.net
Wed May 10 19:28:44 CEST 2006
Of course, you can steal it.
I agree with the trigger thing (and i also had fun with your
patch !), and Cyrille made corrections. I send it back with
the amplitude correction.
> frablanc hat gesagt: // frablanc wrote:
> > Finally, i solved the problem in a quite empiric way, but it
> > seems to work ... I agree, it deserves a lot of cleaning, i
> > put a lot of [bang] to be shure that the coefficients are
> > I send the final abstraction, and a patch which uses it. It's
> > quite fun and i think it sounds great ! ;-)
> Yes, it sound really wonderful I like it a lot (so much I'll
> if you don't mind ;)
> Only with the execution order you still didn't get it right.
> work now, but as soon as you do some further editing it
> Better fix it now. The [bang] objects don't help at all, let me
> explain why: Every "connection fanning" in your patch still
> undefined order. If two or more connections come out of a
> outlet, you cannot tell which one will fire first. If order is
> important, and it practically *always* is, then you must use
> object instead of connection fanning.
> So you should generally avoid more than one connection
coming out of a
> single message outlet. It's trouble waiting to happen, you
> to marry such patches.
> Attached patch shows some of the things that can go wrong with
> connection fanning.
> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_
Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ;
3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34 /mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34/mn)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1709 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Pd-list