[Pd] Latency with 0.39-2
badmuthahubbard at gmail.com
Sat May 20 06:53:34 CEST 2006
Hmm. I'm on WinXP. I don't quite understand how to change this
portaudio business... I did it before with Csound, but someone
provided the necessary files. I have always used ASIO for lower
latency, but it does indeed seem like not using it improves Pd 0.39-2
On 5/20/06, dafydd hughes <dafydd at sideshowmedia.ca> wrote:
> Hi Chuckk
> What platform are you on? I've had no troubles with linux, but on os
> x I've had a lot of audio clicks. The solution for me was to run pd
> in jack instead of portaudio - better latency, no clicks and on some
> heavier patches my cputime meter drops by 15%...
> On 5/20/06, Chuckk Hubbard <badmuthahubbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there any reason this would happen? I have refrained from using
> > 0.39 because I have to set the delay to about 90 ms to use both input
> > and output, whereas with 0.38 I am usually fine with 10 ms.
> > So does this mean something's wrong, or is 0.39 just more expensive?
> > I want the new features.
> > -Chuckk
> > --
> > "Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to
> > work hard at work worth doing."
> > -Theodore Roosevelt
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to
work hard at work worth doing."
More information about the Pd-list