[Pd] Latency with 0.39-2

dafydd hughes dafydd at sideshowmedia.ca
Sat May 20 06:46:02 CEST 2006

Hi Chuckk

What platform are you on?  I've had no troubles with linux, but on os
x I've had a lot of audio clicks.  The solution for me was to run pd
in jack instead of portaudio - better latency, no clicks and on some
heavier patches my cputime meter drops by 15%...


On 5/20/06, Chuckk Hubbard <badmuthahubbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason this would happen?  I have refrained from using
> 0.39 because I have to set the delay to about 90 ms to use both input
> and output, whereas with 0.38 I am usually fine with 10 ms.
> So does this mean something's wrong, or is 0.39 just more expensive?
> I want the new features.
> -Chuckk
> --
> "Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to
> work hard at work worth doing."
> -Theodore Roosevelt
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


More information about the Pd-list mailing list