[PD] switch16 abstraction
padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Fri May 26 12:24:33 CEST 2006
Cool. I was struggling with a mutex switch until Frank put me right
with a diagonal message matrix. I like the use of the array, but I
cant help thinking, is the intermediate storage really needed?
Couldn't it be done in two operations, zero everything and then
just route the 1 to the channel that should be on?
On Thu, 25 May 2006 15:01:16 -0500
"David Powers" <cyborgk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe somebody will find the attached (simple) abstraction useful. I often
> have to trigger a single gemhead on, and everything else off. This is the
> best way that I have found to do it is far... If somebody thinks there is a
> better way, I'd be curious to hear of it.
> I have begun to find that abstractions like this save a lot of time in the
> long run. The main thing a VJ interface has to do, after all, is let me turn
> various GEMHEADS on/off on the fly, so as simple as it is, it's the basis of
> doing live visuals for me (combined with key messages, and midictl
> The test patch demonstrates the abstraction.
More information about the Pd-list