[PD] Settable [catch~] and [s~]

[Enrique Erne]

hi Jamie

it'd be nice to have a setable r~/s~ or catch~/throw~...
attached a solution with throw~ -> catch~ -> s~ -> r~
so you can set both. that will delay the signal about 2 blocks :-(
and i think it might not be suitable for dynamic patching since
it will get an error without the catch~ or s~ ..
good luck!

eni


On Aug 11, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Jamie Bullock wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> This kind of follows on from the recent thread about settable [s]. One 
> thing I have never understood about PD, is why only one side of the 
> [catch~]/[throw~], [s~]/[r~] is settable, and why it is the sender 
> with the former, and the receiver with the latter?
>
> It would be a really useful feature for me to have at least one of 
> these settable at both ends. I am achieving this at the moment with a 
> dynamic patching kludge, but it is quite nasty.
>
> Does anyone think this is worth adding as a feature request, or know 
> an alternate method (without externals).
>
> Jamie
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: shrowNratch.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1674 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20060811/4a428289/attachment.obj>