[PD] "declare" object : "wrong" -path retrieval for embedded abstractions ?

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Thu Nov 9 20:01:58 CET 2006


On Nov 5, 2006, at 2:35 PM, pierre cage wrote:

> Hi list,
>
> I was stupidly thinking of a standard (but redundant) dir hierarchy to
> store dependent abstractions : NAME.pd should contain ( declare -path
> NAME_abs ) and /NAME_abs/ should host embedded abstractions,
> themselves containing ( declare -path ... , etc.
>
> Unfortunately, this can't be done as umbedded "declare" objects miss
> relative dirs to point unanimously to the main dir (i.e to the path of
> the "patch").

Hmm, that sounds like a bug, if I understand it correctly.  Could you  
send examples?

> Comparatively, HCS's "getdir" object does a good job retreiving each
> relative path.

Just to set the record straight, the illustrious Günter Geiger wrote  
[getdir], not me.  I am just an avid user and proponent of it.

.hc



------------------------------------------------------------------------

All information should be free.  - the hacker ethic








More information about the Pd-list mailing list