[PD] up-down saw-wave
martin brinkmann
mnb at martin-brinkmann.de
Wed Nov 22 23:48:59 CET 2006
Frank Barknecht wrote:
...
thanks for the many tipps!
> In the long run you could save quite some CPU cycles by using the more
> traditional clock-based sequencing where possible.
in the past (reaktor) i have used the songposition most of the time, and
made everything counter-based. (always perfectly in sync,
but harder to manually re-sync).
since i was happy that my first pd patch (a 'rockafella'-based
loop-player) was running pretty well (and in sync) with this
pahsor based approach, i continued to use this method. i agree that it
is a waste of cpu. maybe id would be a good idea to use only one phasor
(or a vline based 'phasor') to drive a counter and than use this
counter for the different sequencers. at least when it is not
neccessary to sync the different modules independently.
(groovebox2...)
bis denn!
martin
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list