[PD] Dynamic generation of $0-including objects?
reduzierer at yahoo.de
Thu Feb 8 11:45:16 CET 2007
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 00:16 -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
> Thanks to both of yas! Should probably add this to puredata.org or
> something for posterity. Or a bug report since it's obviously a
a kludge? why?
anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstraction
argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the
same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when you
plan to save the patch with all the dynamically generated stuff, whereas
saving dynamically generated stuff does not make sense at all, as far as
i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require
litteral '$0's as abstraction arguments, would be, if you would use
dynamic patching just as a quicker way of patching.
> On 2/7/07, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:54:40PM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
> > > I'm trying to generate objects within a subpatch using [obj( messages,
> > > and I want those generated objects to have $0 as one of their
> > > arguments, e.g. [myobject $0]. Using [obj x y myobject $0( gives
> > > [myobject 0] (I know $0 is not for messages, just thought I'd give
> > > that a try), and of course [list append $0] to the object message just
> > > adds the interpreted $0 of the parent patch. I'd like to preserve the
> > > "$0". Anyone know of a way to do it?
> > Hi,
> > I think the attached patch demonstrates what you mean.
> > Best,
> > Chris.
> > -------------------
> > chris at mccormick.cx
> > http://mccormick.cx
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
More information about the Pd-list