[PD] Dynamic generation of $0-including objects?

Frank Barknecht fbar at footils.org
Thu Feb 8 13:35:32 CET 2007

Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:

> anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstraction
> argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the
> same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when you
> plan to save the patch with all the dynamically generated stuff, whereas
> saving dynamically generated stuff does not make sense at all, as far as
> i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require
> litteral '$0's as abstraction arguments, would be, if you would use
> dynamic patching just as a quicker way of patching.

... which actually is a very sensible usecase! 

 Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__

More information about the Pd-list mailing list