[PD] Dynamic generation of $0-including objects?

[Roman Haefeli]

On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:35 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> 
> > anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstraction
> > argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the
> > same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when you
> > plan to save the patch with all the dynamically generated stuff, whereas
> > saving dynamically generated stuff does not make sense at all, as far as
> > i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require
> > litteral '$0's as abstraction arguments, would be, if you would use
> > dynamic patching just as a quicker way of patching.
> 
> ... which actually is a very sensible usecase! 

that's why i am mentioning it, though i've never patched like that yet
and i wonder, if this is, what luke is doing.

roman



		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de