[pd] shaper filter
padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Fri Feb 9 08:38:33 CET 2007
Aha, righty ho! Hmm, that's a surprise. I thought
those were intrinsic. I believe they should be.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:30:33 -0600
"Michael Garrett" <mgarrett at garrett-tech.com> wrote:
> Seems to be <~ >~ and ==~ ..
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hard off [mailto:hard.off at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:26 AM
> To: padawan12
> Cc: mgarrett at garrett-tech.com; megalegoland at yahoo.fr; pd-list at iem.at
> Subject: Re: [pd] shaper filter
> no, it was [>~ ]
> i think there's probably an [expr~] equivalent, but couldn't be assed
> to figure it out.
[expr~ $v1 >= $v2] should do it.
More information about the Pd-list