[PD] graphical possibilities in GEM

[zmoelnig at iem.at]

Quoting Patco <megalegoland at yahoo.fr>:

> Patco a écrit :
>> chris clepper a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe if you posted the bugs someone could have a look and perhaps 
>>> fix them.
>>>
>>>
>> I am sorry, but I've posted all of them, :)
>>
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-02/046774.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-09/041995.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-10/042713.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-10/042943.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-10/042946.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-10/043011.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-12/045133.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-12/045145.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2006-12/045428.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-01/045653.html
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-01/045703.html
>
>

feel free to add all of these to the bug-tracker at 
http://sf.net/projects/pd-gem

mfa.sdr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 1718 bytes
Desc: ?ffentlicher PGP-Schl?ssel
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070209/ba24cb9c/attachment.key>